how should one act when the only information available is incomplete?for example, if you knew of, say, a food supplement which was supposed to be beneficial. there was a plausible mechanism for how it worked, plenty of anectdotal reports in favour, maybe some small/not very well done studies that support the claim. but no proper trials yet, and they'd take years before the results were in
would you take it? (you personally, i mean, rather than advising others to)
(would you take it? (you personally, i mean, rather than advising others to)
plentyofants more ghee, vicar?,
Tue 2 Sep 2008, 13:23,
archived)