You've never actually tested this, have you?Just this second loaded up a game. Capped its frame rate to 25 (75htz progressive scan monitor), and verified that it is indeed 25fps by several sources. What do I see? It's very jerky. Very very jerky. Ignoring taring it's still jerky up to 50fps, but 70fps is pretty much smooth as silk.
Easiliy varifiable.
PAL TV looks shite.
(,
Mon 23 Feb 2009, 1:58,
archived)
Easiliy varifiable.
PAL TV looks shite.
Never tested it?I did TV and audio electronics engineering at Salford University and regardless of your 'test' it is clinical fact that the brain can not process more than 25 frames a second which is why 50hz is used in PAL anything less you see flicker and anything higher you perceive a still picture.
You might think PAL is bad and sure there are better but you can bet your arse that NTSC is not it.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wagon-wheel_effect
(You might think PAL is bad and sure there are better but you can bet your arse that NTSC is not it.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wagon-wheel_effect
Pasanonic 's been known to cause insanity in laboratory mice,
Mon 23 Feb 2009, 2:08,
archived)
Still picture?How many games or TV shows involve still pictures? Try it with a moving image, in this little test it was a rotating radar dish if you must know. Honestly guv'. Try it. I'm not bullshitting you.
(,
Mon 23 Feb 2009, 2:11,
archived)
what I mean by 'still picture'is that you do not see the flicker of the frames being drawn above 25fps ( it's actually around 24 point something )
As for your test see the wiki link above as this has been industry standard knowledge since the movies started. Screen frame rates and film speeds are not chosen at random but because of this effect that we can't register the image any faster than 25fps.
(As for your test see the wiki link above as this has been industry standard knowledge since the movies started. Screen frame rates and film speeds are not chosen at random but because of this effect that we can't register the image any faster than 25fps.
Pasanonic 's been known to cause insanity in laboratory mice,
Mon 23 Feb 2009, 2:15,
archived)
There's a differencebetween being able to see a single individual frame at higher than 25fps and being unable to tell between 25 and higher frames a second. www.100fps.com/how_many_frames_can_humans_see.htm
Even Wikipedia says so on the FPS article.
(,
Mon 23 Feb 2009, 2:21,
archived)
Even Wikipedia says so on the FPS article.
ok I'm wrong and you are correct.my education was a waste.
( Pasanonic 's been known to cause insanity in laboratory mice,
Mon 23 Feb 2009, 2:24,
archived)
Your entire life is a fucking waste, you idiot.
Dave Trouser ; the people's choice - 75% agree,
Mon 23 Feb 2009, 2:38,
archived)
"TV and Audio Electronics" has fuck all to do with knowing anything about "clinical facts".The wagon wheel effect is also irrelevant here.
Wow, you prove your ignorance of just about everything more and more each day.
(Wow, you prove your ignorance of just about everything more and more each day.
Dave Trouser ; the people's choice - 75% agree,
Mon 23 Feb 2009, 2:46,
archived)