thats a massively obtuse over-simplification. You categorically cannot take cash off the organization your espousing to slate on the one hand, just in exchange for 'a TV appearance' on the other. Im sorry for your lack of perception in this matter, not mention ,lack of experience in lifes wider margins.
(, Sun 10 Jul 2011, 9:51, Reply)
The point is that he's critisising the tabloid press, and their practices. At no point in that interview does he actually lay into the Murdoch media as a whole. You can get grubby tabloid "news" from The Sun, The Mirror, The Star, The Daily mail... It doesn't have to be owned by Rupert Murdoch to be a tabloid, or to employ the underhand tactics exposed over the last few years. To work in TV and Film and rule out dealings with the rest of Rupert Murdoch's media empire based on your distaste for a tiny, tabloid-shaped corner of it would be foolish and over-idealistic. You accuse me of an obtuse over-simplification, and then feel compelled to tar the entire holdings of News Corporation with the same brush because of the NOTW?!
Also, I think the personal attack ("Im sorry for your lack of perception in this matter, not mention ,lack of experience in lifes wider margins.") was entirely unjustified. You know absolutely nothing about me other than half-a-dozen lines written on the messageboard of a site that has an obsession for purple cocks. It's pretty judgmental to infer my experience of "lifes wider margins" from that.
(, Sun 10 Jul 2011, 10:37, Reply)