![This is a question](/images/board_posticon.gif)
We once made a flash animation for a record company. They told us it was brilliant and 30 staff gave us a round of applause. They asked us to stick it out without their name on it. Then their legal department sent us a cease and desist for infringing their copyright. How have you been screwed over?
( , Fri 3 Aug 2012, 13:46)
« Go Back
![This is a QotW answer](/images/board_posticon.gif)
Young Ronnie was thought to have been a bit naughty, back in the dim and distant.
Actually it was self defence, and luckily the court agreed.
Still, being presented with a sworn statement from a copper just before the case kicked off to the effect that I'd said "Yes, it was me, I did it" was a bit of an eye-opener.
Especially as I'd taken full advantage of the old (and now departed) right to silence during the interview.
Cunts.
( , Thu 9 Aug 2012, 0:16, 18 replies)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
if it didn't attract the sort of person who wants to be a policeman.
( , Thu 9 Aug 2012, 3:12, closed)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
"What's your favowite type of gig, PIG?
Bawwy Manilow?
Or the black & white minstwel show?!"
( , Thu 9 Aug 2012, 10:58, closed)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
Just watched that very episode last night. Comedy doesn't get much better.
( , Thu 9 Aug 2012, 11:52, closed)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
( , Thu 9 Aug 2012, 11:55, closed)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
Has anyone got a straight?
My barely adequate psychic defences are crumbling!
You're in TWUBBLE!
( , Thu 9 Aug 2012, 13:36, closed)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
Wait a minute...
The OP posted a story specifically about the police trying to frame him, and replying that the wrong people join the police makes me a paranoid right-on lefty?
( , Thu 9 Aug 2012, 11:28, closed)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
Sure some policemen are twats. Some are great. I've got a couple of mates in the force. They're ace. Some of their mates are twats. 'Twas ever thus.
( , Thu 9 Aug 2012, 11:32, closed)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
They just helpfully point out that it might harm your defence if you take it.
Which is actually quite nice of them.
( , Thu 9 Aug 2012, 9:42, closed)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
What they've done is allowed silence to be viewed as suspect behaviour that shows guilt.
( , Thu 9 Aug 2012, 10:05, closed)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
I sat on a jury a couple of years ago, and out of four of them only one spoke to the police, and he was the one that went down.
( , Thu 9 Aug 2012, 10:18, closed)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
Ever. They're not looking to get to the bottom of it, so unless you've got damning evidence on or about you that pins you to the offence, shut the hell up and let your solicitor do the talking.
The absolute worst thing you can possibly do is have an interview where you're coming across as being selectively silent.
( , Thu 9 Aug 2012, 11:29, closed)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
It depends on the context of the alleged crime under investigation. In some circumstances, a solicitor can advise a client to remain silent without it adversely affecting the case. For instance, if the client has mental issues and will suffer during an interview.
As I understand it, common advice these days is to give a no comment interview and hand in a written statement instead to avoid adverse inferences being drawn.
( , Thu 9 Aug 2012, 11:22, closed)
« Go Back