What's so wrong with it then?
Eh? Eh?
*pokes DOTF in the chest*
( ,
Sat 18 Dec 2004, 16:51,
archived)
*pokes DOTF in the chest*
I don't understand why they can't replace f u c k with f u <b></b> c k using the filter.
( ,
Sat 18 Dec 2004, 16:52,
archived)
because
that wouldn't piss people off, therefore wouldn't be nearly as much fun.
( ,
Sat 18 Dec 2004, 16:53,
archived)
I'll tell you:
In my opinion, the reason given behind it - that it will help the site not get swallowed by so many work filters - overlooks the fact that people shouldn't be pissing about on b3ta at work
( ,
Sat 18 Dec 2004, 16:55,
archived)
If it wasn't for peopl
pissing about on b3ta at work, the site would be a barron wasteland.
( ,
Sat 18 Dec 2004, 16:57,
archived)
If the site were a barron wasteland
if would remind me too much of my womb.
( ,
Sat 18 Dec 2004, 16:59,
archived)
This is true,
but without all those bored office types, there would be little other than young 'uns, trolls, and the unwashed unemployed oh yes and students (the bloody type) ;)
( ,
Sat 18 Dec 2004, 16:57,
archived)
yeah but no but yeah but
a lot of filters these days download block lists from the filter people, so I doubt it`ll do any good for those
( ,
Sat 18 Dec 2004, 16:57,
archived)
I blame the pea-arse brained
low-browed, hairy-palmed IT workers
( ,
Sat 18 Dec 2004, 16:58,
archived)
I have WOMEN to wank me off
.. ugly ones mind you, but still, the fat birds really make an effort
( ,
Sat 18 Dec 2004, 17:04,
archived)
.. ugly ones mind you, but still, the fat birds really make an effort