b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » XXX » Message 628479 (Thread)

# Bullys.


I know I said 'no more', but I could'nt resist. Ok, back to work (honist guv')
(, Mon 6 Jan 2003, 17:03, archived)
# No, but you see
you've put some effort in. We don't mind bad spelling, and we can tolerate not-so-hot photoshopping, as long as you've put some effort in and tried to make it funny.
(, Mon 6 Jan 2003, 17:06, archived)
# bad spelling?
spelling that bad is almost impossible!
(, Mon 6 Jan 2003, 17:08, archived)
# .
(, Mon 6 Jan 2003, 17:16, archived)
# Objective of Comunication
The objective of comunication was reached. You understood what I was trying to say. Besides, im dyslexic.

Cheers for all the good-comments tho'.

I know it's an excuse for my blatantly bad spellings, and im opening up an invitation for people to correct this message =P
(, Mon 6 Jan 2003, 17:24, archived)
# bastard
bullies
couldn't
honest

sorry
(, Mon 6 Jan 2003, 17:07, archived)
# Phew
I was debating whether to do that. But decided not to seem like the nasty one.

/titter
(, Mon 6 Jan 2003, 17:09, archived)
# Well OK
if you have bad spelling, you might have to endure some pedantry, but thats about it... :)
(, Mon 6 Jan 2003, 17:09, archived)
# shouldn't
that be 'that's about it'?
(, Mon 6 Jan 2003, 17:11, archived)
# probably
(, Mon 6 Jan 2003, 17:12, archived)
#
wheeeeeeeee!
sorry
(, Mon 6 Jan 2003, 17:09, archived)
# and traditionaly it's "lemme"
for "let me".

/scronk
(, Mon 6 Jan 2003, 17:09, archived)
# maybe
he meant 'bastered' as in they have basters...
(, Mon 6 Jan 2003, 17:11, archived)
# yes,
probably.

/flink
(, Mon 6 Jan 2003, 17:14, archived)
# and
he could mean 'bullys' in the bullseye sense. in which case 'bastered bullys!' could be a sort of 'blistering barnacles!' exclamation
(, Mon 6 Jan 2003, 17:16, archived)
#
Moooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!
(, Mon 6 Jan 2003, 17:26, archived)
# you don't get nowt for two in a bed
unless it's the Minogue sisters.
(, Mon 6 Jan 2003, 17:32, archived)
# now you're getting the idea.
....a LOT better than the speach bubble attempts.
(, Mon 6 Jan 2003, 17:10, archived)
# That's quite nice
The colours look a bit funny, and that gives it a nice effect.
(, Mon 6 Jan 2003, 17:15, archived)
# the blurriness of the painting
does indeed suit the action blur of the "hopper" - my only gripe is that that's clearly not a 1970s hopper but one of the new fangled versions - this picture is clearly not genuine!
(, Mon 6 Jan 2003, 17:18, archived)
# Shushhhhh....
I did'nt think anyone would relese. Did'nt they realise a dildo-attachment for these things? Im pritty sure I saw Pop Idol's Fat Rick in Toys'R'Us buying one.
(, Mon 6 Jan 2003, 17:57, archived)