You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » Message 6878733

[challenge entry] A good excuse for a pearoast (for compo)


The website Gillian McKeith is trying to silence can be found here.

Want proof? Just type "Gillian McKeith" into Google.co.uk and see what happens!
(, Mon 19 Feb 2007, 19:51, archived)
# Well you ARE amazingly attractive from behind
/ac
(, Mon 19 Feb 2007, 19:53, archived)
# Somehow reminds me of my favourite QI moment


Blimey... my return to the board after yonks and it appears my 4th birthday was yesterday...!

edit: that better?
(, Mon 19 Feb 2007, 20:09, archived)
# arrrgh! teh png!

(, Mon 19 Feb 2007, 20:11, archived)
# Feck
Been too long. Must... buy... proper... image editing program... for... mac...!

:(
(, Mon 19 Feb 2007, 20:12, archived)
# do they not come with a paint-like program?

(, Mon 19 Feb 2007, 20:25, archived)
# Clarisworks was always good when I used a mac.
That was a LONG time ago though...
(, Mon 19 Feb 2007, 20:57, archived)
# fuck me look at the size of that
yes.. that is better.
(, Mon 19 Feb 2007, 20:11, archived)
# happy b3taday
now quick optimize!
yay, also hurrah for QI
(, Mon 19 Feb 2007, 20:12, archived)
# *blindly follows*
You are too kind.
(, Mon 19 Feb 2007, 20:16, archived)
# roasting?

(, Mon 19 Feb 2007, 19:55, archived)
# Hahaha one of the really early ones!
I've got a cut out of the first one somewhere. I collect useless stuff like that.
(, Mon 19 Feb 2007, 19:56, archived)
# somwhere in my cd collection is a complete set of
garfield strips from the start up to 2006.. although where is anybody's guess
(, Mon 19 Feb 2007, 19:59, archived)
# Well I've got a complete collection
of Garfield stripping.


*yiffs*
(, Mon 19 Feb 2007, 20:03, archived)
# I bet you haven't!
I never posted it!
(, Mon 19 Feb 2007, 20:04, archived)
# Shit - you mean Garfield strip,
not hamtoucher picture.

*is embarassed by own ego*
(, Mon 19 Feb 2007, 20:04, archived)
# don't worry, i thought he meant that too
call that an ego? ;)
(, Mon 19 Feb 2007, 20:06, archived)
# Sorry i couldn't see what you said
The aforementioned ego was in the way:P
(, Mon 19 Feb 2007, 20:38, archived)
# You are stil #9 in Google.com and, if you appeal to Google, they will relist you
without argument and say that they have had a complaint and a counter complaint and the matter rests with the individual parties to resolve.

/SESLondon2007 last week blog
(, Mon 19 Feb 2007, 20:18, archived)
# CRACKING PhD GROMIT!

(, Mon 19 Feb 2007, 20:26, archived)
# That's rather souper.

(, Mon 19 Feb 2007, 20:29, archived)
# *psst*
Smashing:P
(, Mon 19 Feb 2007, 20:42, archived)
# Hahahahaha. I love this.
"ning mister :)
(, Mon 19 Feb 2007, 20:32, archived)
# cracking shop, mugatu!
*waggles fingers*
(, Mon 19 Feb 2007, 20:33, archived)
# those percentage signs
does anyone have an Idiot's Guide To Gradients Presented In Percentages?

I 'get' the 1:10 signs they used to have but things like 12%, 12% of what?
(, Mon 19 Feb 2007, 20:31, archived)
# 12% fewer goats on the road.
FACT.
(, Mon 19 Feb 2007, 20:38, archived)
# Is it
percentage of distance travelled you go up in height - eg a 1:5 gradient is one where you travel one metre in height for every five metres you go forwards, then a 20% means that for every five metres you go forwards, you go upwards one metre - one metre being 20% of 5 metres.

Was that the worst explanation ever? argh
(, Mon 19 Feb 2007, 20:57, archived)
# aha, thank you
so 0% is flat, 100% is a 45 degree road?
(, Mon 19 Feb 2007, 21:03, archived)
# Hahaha.
Excellent link.
(, Mon 19 Feb 2007, 20:35, archived)