Home » Image Challenge » Richard Littlejohn [Suggest a different challenge]
Richard Littlejohn (This challenge is now closed)
Fire up Photoshop and go to town on Daily Mail columnist Richard Littlejohn in any way you please. Then use the word "cloaca" when naming your files. He'll love it. Confused? There's more here.
( , Wed 23 Jun 2010, 21:37)
Fire up Photoshop and go to town on Daily Mail columnist Richard Littlejohn in any way you please. Then use the word "cloaca" when naming your files. He'll love it. Confused? There's more here.
( , Wed 23 Jun 2010, 21:37)
There was little doubt, the Cloaca Monkey was the dumbest, but he sure could pose!
( , Tue 29 Jun 2010, 10:55, More)
( , Tue 29 Jun 2010, 10:55, More)
Bloody replicants......
coming down here killing our toy makers!
edit- cloaca cola nomnom
:-)
( , Mon 28 Jun 2010, 19:49, More)
coming down here killing our toy makers!
edit- cloaca cola nomnom
:-)
( , Mon 28 Jun 2010, 19:49, More)
Things were different in the 70's
I was young and experimental, later, just mental...
Click for bigger Cloaca
( , Sun 27 Jun 2010, 11:04, More)
I was young and experimental, later, just mental...
Click for bigger Cloaca
( , Sun 27 Jun 2010, 11:04, More)
I would call the balloon a cunt (or a cloaca),
but perhaps it would be more effective for me to give a reasoned argument as to why I dislike balloons and why I don't agree with anything they stand for. I would refer to evidence contrary to the standpoint of balloons, employing my intellect to perhaps sway fans of balloons that I am perhaps most likely to be correct, and that balloons are wrong. Through reasoned, supported arguments against balloons, a situation would arise at which balloons would find it difficult to defend themselves and this may cause balloons to lose support, temper their balloonishness, or explode in rage. If I were to simply call the balloon a "cunt", or similar, then the balloon could cry about being bullied by internet people, look like a victim, the fans of the balloon would be equally outraged and defensive, then everything would be forgotten about, the balloons having successfully defended themselves and moved on.
( , Thu 24 Jun 2010, 11:17, More)
but perhaps it would be more effective for me to give a reasoned argument as to why I dislike balloons and why I don't agree with anything they stand for. I would refer to evidence contrary to the standpoint of balloons, employing my intellect to perhaps sway fans of balloons that I am perhaps most likely to be correct, and that balloons are wrong. Through reasoned, supported arguments against balloons, a situation would arise at which balloons would find it difficult to defend themselves and this may cause balloons to lose support, temper their balloonishness, or explode in rage. If I were to simply call the balloon a "cunt", or similar, then the balloon could cry about being bullied by internet people, look like a victim, the fans of the balloon would be equally outraged and defensive, then everything would be forgotten about, the balloons having successfully defended themselves and moved on.
( , Thu 24 Jun 2010, 11:17, More)
Yay!
Thank you, B3ta. Thank you, Magic Donkey!
And, now, treasure from my vault to celebrate:
( , Wed 23 Jun 2010, 23:23, More)
Thank you, B3ta. Thank you, Magic Donkey!
And, now, treasure from my vault to celebrate:
( , Wed 23 Jun 2010, 23:23, More)