b3ta.com qotw
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Question of the Week » Off Topic » Post 1580298 | Search
This is a question Off Topic

Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.

(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
Pages: Latest, 836, 835, 834, 833, 832, ... 1

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

It's not overwhelmingly proven according to my father
who is a science bod.

We didn't cause the mini Ice Age in the middle ages and that was way more dramatic that this shit. The Thames froze solid every winter for decades.
(, Thu 5 Apr 2012, 11:23, 3 replies, latest was 12 years ago)
Wasn't that caused by a massive volcanic explosion that dumped shit-loads of ash into the atomsphere and blocked a significant amount of sunlight
and shit?
(, Thu 5 Apr 2012, 11:24, Reply)
Ah divvent knaa, like.

(, Thu 5 Apr 2012, 11:27, Reply)
You can't prove it, that's kind of the beauty of science.
having said that, my Dad's a fairly epically respected organic chemist and he doesn't believe in it either. The fucker. And he keeps making me buy him climate change denying books for presents. Bet that looks good on Government watch lists.
(, Thu 5 Apr 2012, 11:26, Reply)
If we do ever reach other planets in the Goldilocks zone
We'll have to use them as controls in experiments to find out.
(, Thu 5 Apr 2012, 11:30, Reply)
I never said it was proven, just that the evidence pointed that way
I'll retract overwelmingly, but will was the majority of evidence points that way. My basic view is that reducing the shit we put into the atmosphere is good regardless.
(, Thu 5 Apr 2012, 11:55, Reply)
I think the argument should get away from climate change
and go to being less wasteful and less reliant on forrin oil. Everyone agrees with that, except the forrins.
(, Thu 5 Apr 2012, 11:56, Reply)
Well, yes.
Also, "don't shit where you eat" seems to me quite enough reason not to but stuff into the air that we breath and the water we drink. It all seems pragmatic rather than idealistic to me and I'm not sure why ther would be such resistance.
(, Thu 5 Apr 2012, 12:09, Reply)
Chompy is right...partly
...that a large part of the issue is our dependence on oil, which is running out faster than we realise. If a politician admits "we're running out of oil" then the market goes crazy, idiots panic buy and traders make a fortune. The oil industry has a significant lobby clout too.
(, Thu 5 Apr 2012, 12:27, Reply)
Are you suggesting that we should go out and panic buy oil?
I think you are.
(, Thu 5 Apr 2012, 12:31, Reply)
Fuck that shit....
...I'm sitting on a fucking pasty mountain here.
(, Thu 5 Apr 2012, 12:34, Reply)
I thought chickenlady had lost weight
And I think she'd prefer to be called "pale".
(, Thu 5 Apr 2012, 13:13, Reply)
Cheeky bugger!
In actual fact, I've put on weight of late....too much work to get to the gym or to go rock climbing :(
(, Thu 5 Apr 2012, 14:38, Reply)
yeah man, im with you.
I'm not 100% convinced its man made after reading that Michael chriton book... That the environentalists lobbyers are paid millions as well as the oil ones so they have just as much to personally gain.

But put it that we shouldn't be so wastefull and you're spot on, everyone agrees
(, Thu 5 Apr 2012, 13:37, Reply)

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

Pages: Latest, 836, 835, 834, 833, 832, ... 1