Yes,
she posted both originals and, below them, the composite.
(
Cheril,
Thu 3 Apr 2003, 2:22,
archived)
No.
I meant before they were published. I mean, who's to say the "originals" are the originals. See? ;)
(
GR33DY,
Thu 3 Apr 2003, 2:27,
archived)
yes but he was hypothesizing
that perhaps even those originals (supplied by the nicked photographer) weren't the real originals.
(
zog why change it now?,
Thu 3 Apr 2003, 2:27,
archived)
Gosh,
but that would be dishonest...
(
Cheril,
Thu 3 Apr 2003, 2:29,
archived)