
to say (before I was so rudely deleted) don't you consider 909 x 666 px of shweaty sackage to be marginal overkill ;)
( ,
Thu 3 Apr 2003, 2:57,
archived)

i might see if the other piccie is less blurred tho
edit: ok, better piccy uploaded
( ,
Thu 3 Apr 2003, 3:01,
archived)
edit: ok, better piccy uploaded

but i might just go for vids, much less hassle.
and if you want special piccies, send me a cheque for £25 and i'll see what i can do ;-)
( ,
Thu 3 Apr 2003, 3:10,
archived)
and if you want special piccies, send me a cheque for £25 and i'll see what i can do ;-)

are definitely on the horizon.
( ,
Thu 3 Apr 2003, 3:11,
archived)

i'm not too sure yet, i doubt i could do decent streaming, not affordably anyway, so i'm considering doing vids instead
( ,
Thu 3 Apr 2003, 3:13,
archived)

...moving pictures, as opposed to still pictures. Who will film this opus?
( ,
Thu 3 Apr 2003, 3:20,
archived)

and i really can't afford to sort out proper realtime stuff, so it'll be pre-recorded.
hopefully i'll be able to balance the cam on something at a good angle, not sure i know anyone who'd film it
( ,
Thu 3 Apr 2003, 3:22,
archived)
hopefully i'll be able to balance the cam on something at a good angle, not sure i know anyone who'd film it