b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » XXX » Message 10062387 (Thread)

# Beauty being based entirely on personal taste and perception.
(, Mon 24 May 2010, 12:57, archived)
# Beauty here being a portmanteau for efficiency, predictive power, and so on.
For sure, that a simply hypothesis is better than a complicated one might be thought of as unargued; but I think it's more of an axiom. If you abandon it, science very quickly becomes impossible. I think you're therefore entititled to accept it; it's possible that you're even obliged to do so, on pain of no longer being a scientist.

That still doesn't indicate anything like equivalence with supernaturalism.
(, Mon 24 May 2010, 13:21, archived)
# Ah, well - if we're doing portmanteaus, then Shirley "It is God's will" is just a quicker way of saying
"Theribald-Johnson & co 1937 study of predictive skin disorder concluding that dermatitis leads to engorged neuralgia, from which we can extrapolate thusly ... "
(, Mon 24 May 2010, 13:26, archived)
# If everyone understands that that's what's meant by the phrase "God's will",
then there might be some mileage to the idea.

But I have a hunch that the overwhelming majority of people who use the term "God's will" think that that's all there is to it; they don't, after all, have a great reputation for making use of respected dermatological journals...
(, Mon 24 May 2010, 13:29, archived)
# Hunch, eh?
Sounds unscientific to me.
(, Mon 24 May 2010, 13:32, archived)
# Meh
hunch hypothesis testable by any anthropologist that can be arsed.
(, Mon 24 May 2010, 13:44, archived)