
For sure, that a simply hypothesis is better than a complicated one might be thought of as unargued; but I think it's more of an axiom. If you abandon it, science very quickly becomes impossible. I think you're therefore entititled to accept it; it's possible that you're even obliged to do so, on pain of no longer being a scientist.
That still doesn't indicate anything like equivalence with supernaturalism.
( ,
Mon 24 May 2010, 13:21,
archived)
That still doesn't indicate anything like equivalence with supernaturalism.

"Theribald-Johnson & co 1937 study of predictive skin disorder concluding that dermatitis leads to engorged neuralgia, from which we can extrapolate thusly ... "
( ,
Mon 24 May 2010, 13:26,
archived)

then there might be some mileage to the idea.
But I have a hunch that the overwhelming majority of people who use the term "God's will" think that that's all there is to it; they don't, after all, have a great reputation for making use of respected dermatological journals...
( ,
Mon 24 May 2010, 13:29,
archived)
But I have a hunch that the overwhelming majority of people who use the term "God's will" think that that's all there is to it; they don't, after all, have a great reputation for making use of respected dermatological journals...