b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » XXX » Message 10062544 (Thread)

# The scientific method neither requires an atheistic approach nor a religious approach
It requires the ability to make an observation of a system -- of whatever form, be it mathematical or of nature around us or of an experiment -- formulate an explanation and then, and this is the most important part, make predictions for the behaviour in other situations.

That's it. That's the whole lot. You can do that while believing in lares and penates, you can do that while believing in Allah and you can do that while believing we all live in the belly of Gharak the Great White Wale if you like, just so long as that's what you do and you don't cloud it with your personal beliefs.

If you view that as an 'atheistic approach' then fair enough -- but religion doesn't actually enter into it. It's in the *interpretation* that it comes in, but already the interpretation of some theory is veering into philosophy. At its heart, the 'scientific method' and 'science' are literally just ways of building algorithms. We make an observation, we make a model, then we put in different initial data and predict what will come out, then we compare that prediction with reality. That's science. Everything else is philosophy.



Edit: Of course, this is all just my belief.
(, Mon 24 May 2010, 14:03, archived)
# Indeed.
Hence my point about science and religion being two different questions.
(, Mon 24 May 2010, 14:20, archived)
# I totally agree
But everyone else was saying stuff so I wanted a part of it :) (Also it's an old hobby horse of mine.)
(, Mon 24 May 2010, 14:22, archived)