or make the smaller version a jpgthe people who get offended by jpg compression can go for the click for big and get the png, but these days it shouldn't be too hard to get something that fits in 100k at that size and doesn't look like poo
edit: www.b3tards.com/u/8b5b151f962a8656e5fe/20100602signs.jpg was saved with jpg quality of 91 and comes in at 96k. looks fine to me unless you peer too closely when the jpegishness gets a bit clearer -- but i'd say this would be fine for the board, if it was me posting it.
(not that i actually mind the cfb thing myself; nobby nobody did it for ages with thing-fish, and i didn't mind when he did it either)
(edit: www.b3tards.com/u/8b5b151f962a8656e5fe/20100602signs.jpg was saved with jpg quality of 91 and comes in at 96k. looks fine to me unless you peer too closely when the jpegishness gets a bit clearer -- but i'd say this would be fine for the board, if it was me posting it.
(not that i actually mind the cfb thing myself; nobby nobody did it for ages with thing-fish, and i didn't mind when he did it either)
boris the spider,
Wed 2 Jun 2010, 14:11,
archived)
cheersit's only because I like your stuff I mention it :)
(
emvee cruor deo cruoris,
Wed 2 Jun 2010, 14:24,
archived)
yeahit's just about getting the best presentation :)
( boris the spider,
Wed 2 Jun 2010, 14:26,
archived)
I am please to see 6 results on Google for the word 'jpegishness'
Griffin Saver Something, something, 2006, something.,
Wed 2 Jun 2010, 14:29,
archived)
hahahame too. hopefully it'll be seven soon when google indexes this. tomorrow it'll be in all the dictionaries!
( boris the spider,
Wed 2 Jun 2010, 14:42,
archived)