Can I be antagonistic again and askwhich of the people answering on behalf of SEO on this page would you say appear to have the relevent skills from what they have said?
(I would ask the other way round, but it's probably easier to say who seems good than who seems crap.)
You are one of the few who hasn't skirted around questions. As soon as people avoid questions about what it is they actually do ('It's confidential!'), as so many seem to do, it's hard to have confidence in them.
Has any SEO said anything on this page that made you think 'bullshit'?
((I would ask the other way round, but it's probably easier to say who seems good than who seems crap.)
You are one of the few who hasn't skirted around questions. As soon as people avoid questions about what it is they actually do ('It's confidential!'), as so many seem to do, it's hard to have confidence in them.
Has any SEO said anything on this page that made you think 'bullshit'?
monkeon schmonkeon,
Thu 24 Jun 2010, 1:38,
archived)
That is a question with some potential for industry comeback.If I am honest, I haven't read every post. There is too much and it is growing in a tree-like fashion and I gave up reading sub-threads because I couldn't keep track. I have mainly focused on answering specific questions or point made by you.
Nothing Pedantichrist has said would I criticise (apart from that one bit about link building being both better and cheap from an agency - although he broadly has a point). The comment about DDA was a good one as well; you don't co-opt things that are there for other reasons (like ALT tags).
In fact SEO and DDA go together rather well and we often use DDA compliance to reinforce arguments for site changes. I am not sure waxdart is assertion that there should be an "office fight" over the two disciplines.
Some people's arguments do seem very defensive, but saying that, I have been arguing on the internet for about twelve years and I like to think that I am pretty good at it. Some answers could have been better structured or more detailed, but I have read nothing that would make me shout "bullshit" at anyone, but conversely, there are plenty of people defending SEOs that I wouldn't say have demonstrated deep skill.
(,
Thu 24 Jun 2010, 18:40,
archived)
Nothing Pedantichrist has said would I criticise (apart from that one bit about link building being both better and cheap from an agency - although he broadly has a point). The comment about DDA was a good one as well; you don't co-opt things that are there for other reasons (like ALT tags).
In fact SEO and DDA go together rather well and we often use DDA compliance to reinforce arguments for site changes. I am not sure waxdart is assertion that there should be an "office fight" over the two disciplines.
Some people's arguments do seem very defensive, but saying that, I have been arguing on the internet for about twelve years and I like to think that I am pretty good at it. Some answers could have been better structured or more detailed, but I have read nothing that would make me shout "bullshit" at anyone, but conversely, there are plenty of people defending SEOs that I wouldn't say have demonstrated deep skill.