
But that's assuming this man hasn't got deep seated mental issues. Personally I think Monkeon said it best above, although I don't think by 'no easy answers' as he put it one should consider a simple one such as capital punishment.
( ,
Sat 10 Jul 2010, 1:07,
archived)

but we all know this case will anyway, it is given to all. I don't know, in all seriousness, eye for an eye, would it be so wrong here? It would deter! But would it work!? It might? Is that question so wrong? TBH I just don't know, but from personal experience, I do know, if someone has absolved themselves from empathy, conscience and consequence, maybe we need to intervene and change that? And that would mean what!? I know the answer...
( ,
Sat 10 Jul 2010, 1:28,
archived)

And then I defer to Gandhi on occasion too. Additionally it's kind of offensive on a level where the state has the ability to take away your life, moreover I don't like the idea of a legal fuck up, sending a wrongly convicted man to death row.
( ,
Sat 10 Jul 2010, 2:02,
archived)