Yeah thats fine, but preferential voting systems are much better than First-past-the-post.
(
Joopiter,
Thu 7 Apr 2011, 8:32,
archived)
I (politely) suggest you carefully re-read
the posters you've commented on.
(
Tab Hunter Make this useless process end and so, begin again,
Fri 8 Apr 2011, 20:36,
archived)
My interpretation was that they were rejecting the spending of money on a campaign, rather than addressing which voting method is superior. I do see the "No to No on AV" tagline, but I'm not sure this is the same as "Yes to AV"?
(
Joopiter,
Tue 12 Apr 2011, 6:30,
archived)