'It may be because Art, the main character, is obviously a self-insert of the author. This is an opinion, not a definitive statement, by the way, and it may turn out to be baseless. After all, Sequential Art does include a character by the name of “Phillip H. Jackson.” Sequential Phil, however, is a tiny hamster who rides around in a woman’s bosom. (How does this work out, anyway, when every other species is depicted to be human size?) Art, on the other hand, is a harried graphics designer who crashes on the couch and plays video games at home. I suspect Real World Phil might have more experience with the latter … though more power to him if he turns out to be the former.'
You have to give him credit, he's right on the money
(You have to give him credit, he's right on the money
emvee cruor deo cruoris,
Wed 25 May 2011, 15:02,
archived)
I actually like that guy's reviewsI wasted an hour or so at work reading through them, mainly because I'm a massive nerd.
To be fair to JJ, I seem to remember him once commenting that if he were turned on by the furry stuff he draws he'd never be able to get anything done, or words to that effect.
(To be fair to JJ, I seem to remember him once commenting that if he were turned on by the furry stuff he draws he'd never be able to get anything done, or words to that effect.
boris the spider,
Wed 25 May 2011, 15:04,
archived)