b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » XXX » Message 10517561 (Thread)

# hahaha, the 'absence of Dawkins' bit made me laugh out loud
also: CANDLE!
(, Wed 24 Aug 2011, 21:11, archived)
# An absence of Dawkins
is not proof that he doesn't exist merely that he may not exist.

The probability of a Dawkins cannot be denied and yet probability alone is not enough to prove he exists.
(, Wed 24 Aug 2011, 21:19, archived)