Physically impossible to get a strike?
Bourbon Fox Bourbon is a moron,
Mon 3 Oct 2011, 23:11,
archived)
it's physically impossible to get a strike and not get a strike simultaneously
(
discomeats This canoe,
Mon 3 Oct 2011, 23:16,
archived)
Unless you bowl on two seperate lanes, time it right, and if your bowling accuracy with both arms is equal. Bourbon Fox Bourbon is a moron,
Mon 3 Oct 2011, 23:18,
archived)
what if you are bowling on both planes with only one arm
(
discomeats This canoe,
Mon 3 Oct 2011, 23:19,
archived)
Then you would have to maybe throw one a little softer than the otherso they arrive at their target at the same time.
( Bourbon Fox Bourbon is a moron,
Mon 3 Oct 2011, 23:23,
archived)
Or alternatively, you could get two equally skilled bowlers to bowl at the same time.One aiming for a strike and one deliberately missing completely.
We have to go deeper.
(We have to go deeper.
Bourbon Fox Bourbon is a moron,
Mon 3 Oct 2011, 23:26,
archived)
but if we go deeper into the rabbit holewhat if we find more MSG?
( discomeats This canoe,
Mon 3 Oct 2011, 23:27,
archived)
It's all in the name of theoretical science! I'm sure we will find a solution. Bourbon Fox Bourbon is a moron,
Mon 3 Oct 2011, 23:29,
archived)
I hope the solution involves hot science chicks in hot science chick outfits:D
( discomeats This canoe,
Mon 3 Oct 2011, 23:33,
archived)
Well it wouldn't be science otherwise!I bet even Isaac Newton had a few of them, milling around in white lab coats and being all assistant-y.
( Bourbon Fox Bourbon is a moron,
Mon 3 Oct 2011, 23:50,
archived)
They probably threw apples about and everythingno doubt made some traditional country cider
with a high specific gravity of alchohol
tenuous
(with a high specific gravity of alchohol
tenuous
discomeats This canoe,
Mon 3 Oct 2011, 23:54,
archived)
Unfortunately for history, a condensed, boring version was written. :( Bourbon Fox Bourbon is a moron,
Tue 4 Oct 2011, 0:00,
archived)