
I can't quite understand what you're trying to convey with your post. Is it to inform us of the event, that has been widely covered in the world's media? If so, thank you, but it's pretty redundant.
The only other possible meaning I can derive from your latest fountain of shite is that you're implying that Mickey Mouse, perhaps as a symbol of Disney, are responsible for the recent radioactive leakages from the Fukushima plant. I would like to know more about this theory, as I'm a big Warner Bros fan and would like to use this as a stick to beat namby-pamby Disney fans.
The other possibility is that you are implying that Mickey Mouse is as much a victim in all this as the citizens of Tokyo. I would direct you toward the established fact that Mickey Mouse is not real.
( ,
Thu 3 Nov 2011, 19:03,
archived)
The only other possible meaning I can derive from your latest fountain of shite is that you're implying that Mickey Mouse, perhaps as a symbol of Disney, are responsible for the recent radioactive leakages from the Fukushima plant. I would like to know more about this theory, as I'm a big Warner Bros fan and would like to use this as a stick to beat namby-pamby Disney fans.
The other possibility is that you are implying that Mickey Mouse is as much a victim in all this as the citizens of Tokyo. I would direct you toward the established fact that Mickey Mouse is not real.