b3ta.com board

Home » Messageboard » Trademarks » Message 10726847

Roll up - Roll up!

From the Trademarks challenge. See all 156 entries (closed)

(asciifaceofbob bob bob bob bob bob bob bob, Sun 25 Mar 2012, 12:39, archived)

I will add this quote to add balance.

"There's no prospect of donors influencing government policy but we need to make sure the system does not allow the perception to arise either."

I'm glad that's clear then.

(

Ghoti Fingers, Sun 25 Mar 2012, 12:45, archived)

Spoken like a true PR guy!

But that's all he really is - a frontman for something, that is showing itself to be quite insidious.

(asciifaceofbob bob bob bob bob bob bob bob, Sun 25 Mar 2012, 12:52, archived)

That was Danny Alexander's quote, akshally

Cruddas's statement was equally straightforward though, "Clearly there is no question of donors being able to influence policy or gain undue access to politicians. Specifically, it was categorically not the case that I could offer, or that David Cameron would consider, any access as a result of a donation."

Once again, Im glad that has cleared up any suggestion of impropriety.

(

Ghoti Fingers, Sun 25 Mar 2012, 12:56, archived)

ah! so he wants to make them completely secret

a solution that favours us all!

oh wait..

(

discomeats This canoe, Sun 25 Mar 2012, 12:56, archived)

He could try allowing tobacco advertising/sponsorship to F1 bosses in return for £1m

.....Oh.....that's bindun

(

CanonCaliber A big bore, Sun 25 Mar 2012, 15:47, archived)

Isn't it ridiculous?

How did it ever come to this?

(asciifaceofbob bob bob bob bob bob bob bob, Sun 25 Mar 2012, 18:52, archived)