ThanksI will play about with frame rates, I just assumed as it still had the same number of frames it would be the same file size, just slower. Maybe I don't understand what frame rates are.
(,
Tue 3 Apr 2012, 20:21,
archived)
fpswell say it has 100 frames or individual images, if you reduced that to 50 and doubled the frame time, it'd last the same amount of time but have half the amount of frames saving a load of size, the more frames you cut the more jerky it will look though
(
sock more tea vicar?,
Tue 3 Apr 2012, 20:31,
archived)
Actuallyit's not bad. The compression makes it look more artsy than nazi :)
(
Rotten Eggs I don't know why I call him Gerald,
Tue 3 Apr 2012, 21:44,
archived)