So the 'accusation' is that he had sex with someone of legal age?And this was, seemingly, through 'coercion', and not, by any account, 'force'?
And for this, people are happy to make definitive, recorded, broadcast statements involving the words 'rapist' and 'paedophile'?
I won't try to defend sleazy behaviour, but I certainly won't defend out-and-out ignorant libel. Nor the sort of witch-hunt the internet can put on that would make a Daily Mail reader wince.
(And for this, people are happy to make definitive, recorded, broadcast statements involving the words 'rapist' and 'paedophile'?
I won't try to defend sleazy behaviour, but I certainly won't defend out-and-out ignorant libel. Nor the sort of witch-hunt the internet can put on that would make a Daily Mail reader wince.
joefish It's hard for thee to kick against the pricks,
Thu 20 Mar 2014, 16:36,
archived)