Climate science is evidence based, while climate science denial is an emotionally manipulative appeal to wishful thinking and various other logical fallacies.
If one side of the argument offers categorical statements and evidence, while the other offers insults and nonsense, which side is likely to be correct?
(,
Tue 11 Nov 2025, 1:19,
archived)
If one side of the argument offers categorical statements and evidence, while the other offers insults and nonsense, which side is likely to be correct?