b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » XXX » Message 1188599 (Thread)

# heeeee
stupid motherfucker
(, Mon 12 May 2003, 22:16, archived)
# fewer
not less.
(, Mon 12 May 2003, 22:16, archived)
# Quite right
That grates on my nerves so much when people get that wrong
(, Mon 12 May 2003, 22:18, archived)
# Unless he means
people "who are less strange"...
But yes, I get quite annoyed by people confusing less and fewer. Oh, and it should be "of whom he is quite fond", but at least the whom is correct.
(, Mon 12 May 2003, 22:18, archived)
# In the words of Winston Churchill,
I do feel that that last objection "is a rule up with which we should not put". :)
(, Mon 12 May 2003, 22:23, archived)
# What
did you bring that book about down under to read out of up for?

Ted, where Bill had had "had", had had "had had". "Had had" had had more weight with the examiner.
(, Mon 12 May 2003, 22:26, archived)