hmm
bit of a grey area that one
(
vork and burlap,
Fri 5 Sep 2003, 12:20,
archived)
as long as
it's not that ludicrous "they're"
(
butchbint,
Fri 5 Sep 2003, 12:21,
archived)
They are = they're
Whyzat ludicrous?
(
A!. touching Shatner's Bassoon.,
Fri 5 Sep 2003, 12:23,
archived)
long
story
basically just get all your grammar wrong and everthing will make sense after a while
(
vork and burlap,
Fri 5 Sep 2003, 12:25,
archived)
No of the problem thens that I be usual having
Not be presenting no difficult not no more then. Thanks!
(
A!. touching Shatner's Bassoon.,
Fri 5 Sep 2003, 12:27,
archived)
that was like
babelfish japanese
brilliant
(
vork and burlap,
Fri 5 Sep 2003, 12:28,
archived)
Of your website band and music then I like be much of it.
Sounds good in the ears of mine on my head oh yes good lovely.
(
A!. touching Shatner's Bassoon.,
Fri 5 Sep 2003, 12:30,
archived)
why thank you
knew it was a good idea sticking the link on there...
(
vork and burlap,
Fri 5 Sep 2003, 12:32,
archived)
i
thought it was a play on that ?
(
ablufia v0.43 - have your face drawn,
Fri 5 Sep 2003, 12:25,
archived)
it was
but never use "you're" next to "all gay"
(
butchbint,
Fri 5 Sep 2003, 12:29,
archived)
oh
yeah - i'm dead confused now...bugger !
(
ablufia v0.43 - have your face drawn,
Fri 5 Sep 2003, 12:35,
archived)
and
leave my elephantism out of this !
(
ablufia v0.43 - have your face drawn,
Fri 5 Sep 2003, 12:26,
archived)