but, whyyyyyyyyyyyyy?
does he offer any insightful reasons as to why the US would want to cost itself the $$$, short of a reason to blame shooting 'terror suspects' etc?
surely there is a counter-conspiracy, about the conspiracy, about the conspiracy?
(
ad,
Wed 21 Apr 2004, 16:51,
archived)
Not really,
but I got bored and stopped reading after a while.
(
Gype,
Wed 21 Apr 2004, 16:53,
archived)