b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » XXX » Message 3074857 (Thread)

# Put on the tin-foil helmets, folks!
(, Wed 21 Apr 2004, 16:34, archived)
# Linky and Dinky perchance ?
(, Wed 21 Apr 2004, 16:36, archived)
# Crikey!!!
That's quite incredible. And the person who posted that is probably dead in a ditch somewhere now.
(, Wed 21 Apr 2004, 16:38, archived)
# bah!
worst optimised images EVER
(, Wed 21 Apr 2004, 16:40, archived)
# CONSPIRACY!
*hides under desk and looks around shiftily*
(, Wed 21 Apr 2004, 16:40, archived)
# Pardon my apathy
Couldn't be arsed to read it all, anyone care to give me a summary?
(, Wed 21 Apr 2004, 16:43, archived)
# Plane that hit tower
may be the incorrect model of the one authorities say hit the tower and may have been adapted to fire missiles.
(, Wed 21 Apr 2004, 16:45, archived)
# The planes at the World Trade Centre
Fired missiles into it a split second before impact. And the evidence is quite sound.

Something in a cigar shape does launch off and explodes through the windows before the actual plane touches the building.

Scary
(, Wed 21 Apr 2004, 16:45, archived)
# er
why bother with missiles when you already have a large plane full of fuel?
(, Wed 21 Apr 2004, 16:54, archived)
# He claims
that the USA did the twin towers with missles launched from modified aircraft, then blew them up with bombs inside the buildings to demolish them.
(, Wed 21 Apr 2004, 16:46, archived)
# but, whyyyyyyyyyyyyy?
does he offer any insightful reasons as to why the US would want to cost itself the $$$, short of a reason to blame shooting "terror suspects" etc?
surely there is a counter-conspiracy, about the conspiracy, about the conspiracy?
(, Wed 21 Apr 2004, 16:51, archived)
# Not really,
but I got bored and stopped reading after a while.

(, Wed 21 Apr 2004, 16:53, archived)