b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » XXX » Message 3289198 (Thread)

# exactly my fears as well.
Which is why I tested the same principle with an areosol can of air freshener for 3 hours straight. Other than some moderate bursn, it was all good. As this is only the prototype model, I hope to incoporate some sort of anti-explosion device into later versions, perhaps some solder or wax around the nozzle or in a gasket which would melt and seal off the flame before it reached the tank.
(, Sat 5 Jun 2004, 9:55, archived)
# Sounds good.
I'm sure the only danger would be if there was a loss of pressure (the fuel coming out slower than a flame travels along it).

Edit: Oops, that's already be said :)
(, Sat 5 Jun 2004, 9:59, archived)
# from a scientific view:
the fire should not be able to get to the tank.
First it would have to travel back through a series of small diameter tubes which would be full of the liquid. To actually burn, it would need oxygen. In the tubes it woulnt actually be able to travel either way.
If it actually did get into the tank, the same thing might help, ie there would only be a small amount of air in the tank, the rest liquid. However if say, the cap is off the top then it would burn. However if it is car washer fluid, it doesnt burn quickly enough to actually explode, rather burn inside the tank and hopefully just melt the gun rather than blow up in your face.
Even so, if i were doing it, id test it by remote control the first time. IE stick it in a workmate vice and push the trigger with a long pole :D
(, Sat 5 Jun 2004, 10:15, archived)
# Or get a helpful friend
to try it out first.

But where's the fun and tension there?
(, Sat 5 Jun 2004, 10:22, archived)