but I thought I'd mention that your profile link site confuses me a bit.
I'm not sure exactly what it's against. I know Bush, but the bit about Bush using double negatives and move-on seem to be part of the problem too because they parodied ads and then bush parodied their parodies and now you want people to parody Bush's parodies of their parodies of Bush's ads to begin with????
I don't quite get the explanatory text is all :)
(,
Mon 5 Jul 2004, 23:51,
archived)
I'm not sure exactly what it's against. I know Bush, but the bit about Bush using double negatives and move-on seem to be part of the problem too because they parodied ads and then bush parodied their parodies and now you want people to parody Bush's parodies of their parodies of Bush's ads to begin with????
I don't quite get the explanatory text is all :)
I wrote it under pressure from Dan, and haven't been arsed to change it yet. It was originally just going to be a holding page for the edit that I'd done, then other people said they wanted to get involved. As you can see, the designs not really suited to what I'm going to use it for either.
I'll be sorting all this out when I get a day or evening when I'm not working or on a roof.
To actually answer your question, it's just trying to inform and get people involved a bit. There are some silly/funny ones to go up to balance out the serious/biting ones.
(,
Mon 5 Jul 2004, 23:55,
archived)
I'll be sorting all this out when I get a day or evening when I'm not working or on a roof.
To actually answer your question, it's just trying to inform and get people involved a bit. There are some silly/funny ones to go up to balance out the serious/biting ones.
so unintentionally ironic that they wouldn't need editing :)
(,
Mon 5 Jul 2004, 23:58,
archived)