1) She was an aid worker. Ken was a worker (for money).
2) Margaret lived in Iraq for 10 years. Ken went over there to make money....in a war zone..
3) Ken went over there, not only knowing the risks, but not giving a thought to his family who were rightfully devastated.
In conclusion, I make the distinction because Margaret was selfless. Ken was nearing the opposite of selfless, and yes it is a terrible thing that they both died but look at the facts - who had more control over their fate in the time leading up to their deaths?
(2) Margaret lived in Iraq for 10 years. Ken went over there to make money....in a war zone..
3) Ken went over there, not only knowing the risks, but not giving a thought to his family who were rightfully devastated.
In conclusion, I make the distinction because Margaret was selfless. Ken was nearing the opposite of selfless, and yes it is a terrible thing that they both died but look at the facts - who had more control over their fate in the time leading up to their deaths?
Spunkmeyer,
Wed 17 Nov 2004, 16:35,
archived)