b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » XXX » Message 5594743 (Thread)

# One. You seem to take me seriously
two. I don't care what people think. I type to elicit a response.
three. I never EVER said I applied filters to my brushed artwork, you just assumed it. If I't's filters then reproduce it. I'm only having a laugh with my original post but being told I just apply a couple of filters? That pisses me off.
(, Sun 29 Jan 2006, 4:17, archived)
# hang about
two and three are contradictory...
(, Sun 29 Jan 2006, 4:18, archived)
# so I'm cunt.
beat me with wet vines.
(, Sun 29 Jan 2006, 4:19, archived)
# anyway
tracing is almost as bad
(, Sun 29 Jan 2006, 4:23, archived)
# lots of people have traced things...
surely it's the interpretive aspect that is important?
(, Sun 29 Jan 2006, 4:30, archived)
# tracing isn't interpreting
(, Sun 29 Jan 2006, 4:31, archived)
# *kicks andy warhol in the cunt*
(, Sun 29 Jan 2006, 4:33, archived)
# what am I tracing?
I've not traced anything in months and then only for vectors.
(, Sun 29 Jan 2006, 4:32, archived)
# I was giving you the benefit of the doubt
rather than assuming you just went over the image with dodge and burn tools...
(, Sun 29 Jan 2006, 4:35, archived)
# Don't presume that you can give me anything.
I have pencils older than you and whilst I have barely sat by and watched you ridicule others who try and create original works don't for a minute think I will put up with it when it's directed at me little boy. You would be better served putting your energy into creating something new of your own rather than gaining a reputation for slagging off the work of others.
(, Sun 29 Jan 2006, 5:01, archived)
# hahahah
what the fuck does that mean?


edit/ tell you what, when this amazing new "painting" style of yours makes you rich and famous, then and only then will I let you lord it over me. Until then, I will consider you a sad old man.
(, Sun 29 Jan 2006, 5:03, archived)
# wow, having read your posts, you seem like a whopping great cunt.
...




cunt.
(, Sun 29 Jan 2006, 9:07, archived)
# HAHAHAHA ROFLMAOZORDZ!!!!!!!1!!1111!!1!111!
i've just been slowly reading through this post and everybody had some sort well structured argument.
but this, is probably the best post here......
oooooh and i just pissed myself
(, Sun 29 Jan 2006, 10:43, archived)
# Haha!
(, Sun 29 Jan 2006, 4:20, archived)
# I'm sorry
I misread this post. My criticism would be that your portraits look uglier than the original images. Although, modern art likes that occasionally.
(, Sun 29 Jan 2006, 4:19, archived)
# And some people don't like modern art.
Now kiss and bum/make up.
(, Sun 29 Jan 2006, 4:21, archived)
# they are meant to look like that.
it's a kind of impasto style meant to look like acrylic paints.
(, Sun 29 Jan 2006, 4:25, archived)
# Can you let me know some how, by changing your username or something...
after you've completed the tutorial, if you ever do. Try submitting it anyway, it could still get in as it's useful to everyone even if Rob himself didn't want one doing.
(, Sun 29 Jan 2006, 4:26, archived)
# blur 22%
dodge, burn, blur again.
duplicate blend multiply, repeat. It gets there in the end.
(, Sun 29 Jan 2006, 4:30, archived)
# Oh.
Cheers, gonna have a go.
(, Sun 29 Jan 2006, 4:35, archived)
# I'm taking the piss.
Let me make a coffee ands I'll see if i can come up with something useable.
(, Sun 29 Jan 2006, 4:38, archived)
# making things aesthetically unappealing is hardly a new development in art...
(, Sun 29 Jan 2006, 4:25, archived)