hmmm . the 3d works better with single frames (red/cyan, again)(
OneOfSome,
Sun 26 Nov 2006, 6:21,
archived)
This looks good with R+G to me.Maybe the motion messes with my eyes.
(
Tahkcalb ω∞ for sigs,
Sun 26 Nov 2006, 6:22,
archived)
the motion isnt helping overallhere, the background is 3d, and the 3d objects are just 2d images .. however, you will notice, having something in the foreground as an overlay to the anaglyph gives it more perceptible depth, as your eyes focus on the teapot first
( OneOfSome,
Sun 26 Nov 2006, 6:31,
archived)
That's the kind of thing I'vegot to spend time on. (See note below)
Working out what options to use. Once
I've got it set in my head what I can
do-- I'll feel better about attempting
some actual serious ideas with this
Anaglyph thing.
(Working out what options to use. Once
I've got it set in my head what I can
do-- I'll feel better about attempting
some actual serious ideas with this
Anaglyph thing.
Tahkcalb ω∞ for sigs,
Sun 26 Nov 2006, 6:39,
archived)
i look forward to seeing what you come up with ..its all in the fiddling, sheer repetition and trial and error to see what actually works .
good luck and all that jazz
(good luck and all that jazz
OneOfSome,
Sun 26 Nov 2006, 7:03,
archived)