b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » XXX » Message 667388 (Thread)

# but it says 'hand's'...


hadn't seen the 'its/it's'
(, Tue 14 Jan 2003, 14:22, archived)
# but the pic
previously refers to the plural "hands", so it should be hands'
(, Tue 14 Jan 2003, 14:32, archived)
# and shouldn't it be
don't instead of dont?
(, Tue 14 Jan 2003, 14:34, archived)
# good point
but there is only one hand in the picture therefore the referential object is singular...
(, Tue 14 Jan 2003, 14:34, archived)
# that's
what i originally thought but i reckon that
a) keeping the grammar of the whole ad consistent makes more sense than chopping and changing depending on the picture in each frame
b)we should probably get a life
(, Tue 14 Jan 2003, 14:40, archived)
# You managed to suck all the fun
out of that for me. Now i dont like it.
(, Tue 14 Jan 2003, 14:42, archived)
# har
we're cheeky suckers...

A misplaced apostrophe will generally cause the Anal Retentives on the board to get all shirty. You were just unlucky in that you had a couple of mistakes.
(, Tue 14 Jan 2003, 14:48, archived)