I believe that there is a longstanding protectionof 'fair use' providing the image is being used for the purposes of parody. Hence the existence of Private Eye magazine. If they had any of their images nicked by Zoo, I imagine they'd get quite litigious quite quickly...
(
man/child/goblin should be old enough to know better by now,
Tue 27 Feb 2007, 19:15,
archived)
Yup that is trueOh and it's worth looking into these ppl
creativecommons.org/license/
and popping it in your profile.
(creativecommons.org/license/
and popping it in your profile.
riverghost servicing your mum since,
Tue 27 Feb 2007, 19:30,
archived)