![Challenge Entry: New Theme Parks [challenge entry]](/images/board_posticon_c.gif)
Seemed better in my head but then I think i'm a sex god too..


From the New Theme Parks challenge. See all 182 entries (closed)
( , Thu 17 May 2007, 19:06, archived)

oh, and this link was still in my cache

it randomly selects one of the participants to be eliminated.
any one (x) from the total (y) without pre-disposition is actually random
we're just seeing one loop of the camera section of the ride
( ,
Thu 17 May 2007, 19:10,
archived)
any one (x) from the total (y) without pre-disposition is actually random
we're just seeing one loop of the camera section of the ride

Like a cryptographic message. I think.
And one mans shite animation is another mans hours of efforts, googling the world over for tutorials*
*Contains outright lies
( ,
Thu 17 May 2007, 19:15,
archived)
And one mans shite animation is another mans hours of efforts, googling the world over for tutorials*
*Contains outright lies

if you want to improve it try and make the cars move, and do three loops where a different person falls out (or have people flying out in the distance on one loop)
will loop better, and people may understand it better
(not that i'd be able to do any of that)
( ,
Thu 17 May 2007, 19:18,
archived)
will loop better, and people may understand it better
(not that i'd be able to do any of that)

people getting emplaled on bits of the track followed by several more circuits with random people falling out, all in a seemless transition and for under 250kb. But then it all went wrong....cries.
( ,
Thu 17 May 2007, 19:20,
archived)

under 250k would be near impossible, but there's always the preview and link.
good work anyway, at least it fits the brief unlike this
( ,
Thu 17 May 2007, 19:22,
archived)
good work anyway, at least it fits the brief unlike this

in not wanting a flamethrower up ones arse does tend to focus your attention...
( ,
Thu 17 May 2007, 19:24,
archived)