'historical science'
What on Earth are you banging on about? there is no real support in science, the fossil record, observational experience etc. for either of them.
So basically you're just ranting because the compo was stated in a slightly flippant way?
And don't pretend you agree with me, you said that creationism was 100% science based. there may well be 10,000 scientists in the US alone who believe in creationism. But you have to remember that they are American.
( ,
Thu 14 Jun 2007, 11:02,
archived)
So basically you're just ranting because the compo was stated in a slightly flippant way?
And don't pretend you agree with me, you said that creationism was 100% science based. there may well be 10,000 scientists in the US alone who believe in creationism. But you have to remember that they are American.