Creationism is based on the science of bad scientists...Who lecture to uneducated masses because they daren't peddle their crackpot theories to someone who is intelligent enough to actually understand and debate them.
Who get shot down at every one of their presentations where actual scientists attend, then even when they admit they may be wrong go on to repeat the same discredited tosh at their next stop on the lecture circuit.
Who are still trying to take cheap shots at Darwin's theories from a century ago, using age-old hoaxes as 'Piltdown Man' as 'evidence' and completely failing to grasp that evolutionary theory has actually vastly improved its case over the last 100 years.
Who are blindly ignorant to the fact that although evidence for evolution is not overwhelming nor 100% proof, it does completely overwhelm the misrepresentations required to point to creationism, just as the number of people who call themselves 'scientists' and believe in creationism are vastly overwhelmed by people with recognised scientific credentials who don't.
(Who get shot down at every one of their presentations where actual scientists attend, then even when they admit they may be wrong go on to repeat the same discredited tosh at their next stop on the lecture circuit.
Who are still trying to take cheap shots at Darwin's theories from a century ago, using age-old hoaxes as 'Piltdown Man' as 'evidence' and completely failing to grasp that evolutionary theory has actually vastly improved its case over the last 100 years.
Who are blindly ignorant to the fact that although evidence for evolution is not overwhelming nor 100% proof, it does completely overwhelm the misrepresentations required to point to creationism, just as the number of people who call themselves 'scientists' and believe in creationism are vastly overwhelmed by people with recognised scientific credentials who don't.
joefish It's hard for thee to kick against the pricks,
Thu 14 Jun 2007, 11:28,
archived)