
not 'spend money'. Yes, the shops there did okay, but most people browsed rather than spent, and the age of the premises meant that the rents were kept low enough for the low profits to be okay for traders. The new shops will charge more, and make more because they'll sell mainstream stuff that you can buy anywhere - so why not buy it there?
( ,
Wed 12 Dec 2007, 14:07,
archived)

It was the only place to get a lot of the stuff I wanted before the net caught on in a big way.
( ,
Wed 12 Dec 2007, 14:09,
archived)

but I don't think I've bought anything there since, despite going a couple of times a year.
Don't get me wrong, I loved the old Camden, but the government is right when they argue that the area is going to make more money.
"Local authorities should ensure that their markets remain attractive and competitive by investing in their improvement." It's all down to what you classify as 'improvement'. Personally I think that they're destroying the character of the last remaining place of goth/rock culture, they think it's making the place nicer for 'normal people', I guess.
( ,
Wed 12 Dec 2007, 14:17,
archived)
Don't get me wrong, I loved the old Camden, but the government is right when they argue that the area is going to make more money.
"Local authorities should ensure that their markets remain attractive and competitive by investing in their improvement." It's all down to what you classify as 'improvement'. Personally I think that they're destroying the character of the last remaining place of goth/rock culture, they think it's making the place nicer for 'normal people', I guess.