If Art needs explanation
then whoever is looking is asking before thinking.
(
The_Judderman,
Wed 26 Dec 2007, 4:19,
archived)
Of course
If there is no explanation then there is no Art
(
The_Judderman,
Wed 26 Dec 2007, 4:22,
archived)
You're trying too hard.
I could chuck a raw chicken off my balcony and it would be art.
Someone could come along and explain why it's art, and it would automatically become shit.
(
gronkpan @vomitinglarry.bsky.social,
Wed 26 Dec 2007, 5:05,
archived)
If art needs explanation
it's an idea that didn't work out
(
..wil,
Wed 26 Dec 2007, 4:25,
archived)
Yes but then your argument depends on the word Need
All Art should HAVE an explanation. If it NEEDS it then that is either a reflection on the artist or the viewer.
(
The_Judderman,
Wed 26 Dec 2007, 4:34,
archived)