Yes.As is anyone that tries to fight bigotry with more bigotry.
(
gronkpan https://twitter.com/VomitingLarry,
Thu 24 Jan 2008, 23:00,
archived)
ThisI see a fundamentalist.
An atheist declaring any non-atheist to be 'clinically insane' is no better than a Muslim denouncing non-Muslims, a Rabbi denouncing gentiles or the Pope declaring that any non-Catholic is mad.
Fundamentalism is a problem, whatever it's guise and religious intolerance has caused more wars than any other single factor. I can think of no larger example of religious inteolerance than Dawkins.
(An atheist declaring any non-atheist to be 'clinically insane' is no better than a Muslim denouncing non-Muslims, a Rabbi denouncing gentiles or the Pope declaring that any non-Catholic is mad.
Fundamentalism is a problem, whatever it's guise and religious intolerance has caused more wars than any other single factor. I can think of no larger example of religious inteolerance than Dawkins.
LordManley twitter.com/LordManley,
Thu 24 Jan 2008, 23:18,
archived)
Hitler will be disappointed to hear that.
my other username is a porsche , posting shit pictures so you don't have to,
Thu 24 Jan 2008, 23:21,
archived)
Really?Because I would suggest that Hitler's intolerance of religion was nothing compared to Dawkins's.
Of course, you probably are referring to the genocide of the Jews. That was not about Judeism, it was about a race.
(Of course, you probably are referring to the genocide of the Jews. That was not about Judeism, it was about a race.
LordManley twitter.com/LordManley,
Thu 24 Jan 2008, 23:27,
archived)