I can't see how a screen capture software can infringe anyone's copyright.What the material is that you capture and what you then choose to do with it is then where you get into that dilemma.
This is mainly a better alternative to print screen and it does video with sound. It is a cheaper version of Camtasia ( which is fantastic ) for people wanting to make videos of whatever is on screen ( for tutorials and the like )
(This is mainly a better alternative to print screen and it does video with sound. It is a cheaper version of Camtasia ( which is fantastic ) for people wanting to make videos of whatever is on screen ( for tutorials and the like )
Pasanonic 's been known to cause insanity in laboratory mice,
Thu 20 Mar 2008, 14:26,
archived)
Wayyyy....I was only asking...
Thank for that though, I may give this a go..
(Thank for that though, I may give this a go..
Wobbly Bloke Hello, did I miss anything on,
Thu 20 Mar 2008, 14:36,
archived)
I didn't intend to sound pissyor anything. I just didn't elaborate enough to sound fluffy. ;) I'm pinting out the genuine uses here for you. What it's really great for is when you play movies from the latest films you have downloaded you can capture parts of it to make gifs for b3ta before anyone else does. Fuck the copyright :D ( do I work for Nuts? )
( Pasanonic 's been known to cause insanity in laboratory mice,
Thu 20 Mar 2008, 14:40,
archived)
Ok...No I don't work for Nuts - Do you work for Tech Smith?
( Wobbly Bloke Hello, did I miss anything on,
Thu 20 Mar 2008, 14:48,
archived)