
So ... would become . . .
Also, I don't want to run replace twice on the string when I can (hopefully) write a regex that will do the job in one pass. I know it's possible, I just haven't been able to get it right.
( ,
Sun 20 Apr 2008, 5:55,
archived)
Also, I don't want to run replace twice on the string when I can (hopefully) write a regex that will do the job in one pass. I know it's possible, I just haven't been able to get it right.