Oh and so now you are generalising about me,AND passing off child porn as a 'mild case' or so it seems.
Having 4000 pictures of naked kids on your laptop is not right, whatever the fucking media they are made with.
(Having 4000 pictures of naked kids on your laptop is not right, whatever the fucking media they are made with.
PointlessCamel Last one on drugs is a queer.,
Tue 2 Sep 2008, 3:51,
archived)
you don't know what those pics featured any more than i do.again: were they drawings? pics of naked kids put up on the internet by moms and dads who think they're cute? actual splayed baby-genitals being licked by adults? we don't know, but they're all illegal in certain places.
by your account it's not right. others disagree, and still others are more worried about the police and government having the right to poke into your computer or desk drawer to see if what gets you off is something that others frown upon.
(by your account it's not right. others disagree, and still others are more worried about the police and government having the right to poke into your computer or desk drawer to see if what gets you off is something that others frown upon.
postbear has metal knees,
Tue 2 Sep 2008, 3:55,
archived)
you know simulated child porno images are actually illegal in the us and a few other countries.maybe yours?
( d d,
Tue 2 Sep 2008, 4:58,
archived)
yes, i do know that. it bothers me, too.what constitutes porn? it's so bloody subjective that people have been arrested for having snapshots of their own kids in the bath. further, it sparks a chilling effect, and can be used to harass artist and people on the sexual fringe who are not victimising children.
( postbear has metal knees,
Tue 2 Sep 2008, 5:05,
archived)