b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » XXX » Message 8750207 (Thread)

# kudos on the patience to do it
is it to do with photoshop layers and 'screen'?*

or is it 'multiply'? i forget
(, Tue 16 Sep 2008, 22:00, archived)
# Clipping mask!
(, Tue 16 Sep 2008, 22:01, archived)
# you again!!!!
"clipping mask!" was his battle cry
(, Tue 16 Sep 2008, 22:02, archived)
# Clippin- Oh wait. :D
(, Tue 16 Sep 2008, 22:03, archived)
# nah
just multiple layers of text in different shades. Then select a shade of colour, inverse the selection and delete that from that text layer. Repeat for each shade and job done.

Takes far far longer to get the text in to the picture than it does to do the effect.
(, Tue 16 Sep 2008, 22:01, archived)
# If you use clipping mask, it'll be a lot easier.
And then burn or dodge to get the desired shadow/light.
(, Tue 16 Sep 2008, 22:02, archived)
# easiers you say?
it's only taking about 5 minutes to get the effect right. It's the bloody hour of getting the text in there in the first place that's annoying!
(, Tue 16 Sep 2008, 22:04, archived)
# wouldn't it be simpler to copy the text off t'internet
paste into an editor
format it
then paste it into photoshop
then wang the pic behind it and change the text layer mode thing to make the pic show through it?
(, Tue 16 Sep 2008, 22:03, archived)
# oh
yeah

*spangs self*

(for the pasting into an editor part)
(, Tue 16 Sep 2008, 22:05, archived)
# Yes.
It should take longer to find the text and copy it as an image than it does to have the software produce the image effect for you.
(, Tue 16 Sep 2008, 22:06, archived)
# Put the pic on the layer above the text, set it to clipping mask, and then the only part of the image that shows through is that with text below it.
(, Tue 16 Sep 2008, 22:06, archived)
# i have learned something useful
(, Tue 16 Sep 2008, 22:08, archived)
# I could do it that way
but the way I'm doing it only takes a few minutes anyway (with fiddling to get exactly the right shades and areas). It's a method I'm comfortable with, so may not be the quickest or best but the end results look OK I think.

I'll give that method a go though. Cheers :)
(, Tue 16 Sep 2008, 22:11, archived)