except the Neville Chamberlain approach was flawed in the face of a large and powerful aggressorrather than a non-existant pseudo-enemy as it is now.
There's no problem in looking for peace when there's no-one to fight.
And gung-ho aggression is a much, much worse way to play politics.
(There's no problem in looking for peace when there's no-one to fight.
And gung-ho aggression is a much, much worse way to play politics.
chenobble rocking his explorer beard on,
Fri 26 Sep 2008, 15:53,
archived)
gung-ho aggression is what america is famous for.even if the new president decides it's a bad approach, how many people will want to vote him out of office for being soft on johnny foreigner?
(
Smash Monkey lowering the tone of the whole internet,
Fri 26 Sep 2008, 15:56,
archived)