
I'll put the TJ's in new threads from now on and say it's endorsed from you?
( ,
Sat 27 Sep 2008, 19:27,
archived)

Would you like to try a valid retort?
Are you aware of the reason that 50k is the max for an image? 250k is probably about 50p to someone with capped internet.
( ,
Sat 27 Sep 2008, 19:34,
archived)
Are you aware of the reason that 50k is the max for an image? 250k is probably about 50p to someone with capped internet.

Try behaving like a grown man instead of a whining fool. I'm older than you, youngster.
Second - would you like to explain why 250k equates to 50p? I have never heard such rubbish.
Third - if you are so concerned about file size and looking after the capped (I'm one) why do you persist in TJing with useless, pointless photos?
I could probably carry on but I have better things to do.
( ,
Sat 27 Sep 2008, 19:47,
archived)
Second - would you like to explain why 250k equates to 50p? I have never heard such rubbish.
Third - if you are so concerned about file size and looking after the capped (I'm one) why do you persist in TJing with useless, pointless photos?
I could probably carry on but I have better things to do.

2) If I TJ it rarely had an image attached, if it does it's linked.
3) You may be loaded, but I know many b3tards that would rather not pay an extra 5-10 quid a month due to over sized images from b3ta.
4) If you really want to have an opinion use your main account or have you really only contributed 100 posts a year?
5) If I really was that bad of a nazi why would I have optimised the image for them?
huh?
*sigh*
( ,
Sat 27 Sep 2008, 19:52,
archived)
3) You may be loaded, but I know many b3tards that would rather not pay an extra 5-10 quid a month due to over sized images from b3ta.
4) If you really want to have an opinion use your main account or have you really only contributed 100 posts a year?
5) If I really was that bad of a nazi why would I have optimised the image for them?
huh?
*sigh*