It's because boys have a better potential of bringing an income into the family unit
grandparents can't live off a girl.
(
gronkpan @vomitinglarry.bsky.social,
Mon 29 Sep 2008, 13:08,
archived)
don't you go talking the same as me gronkpan! you know the rules!
we must fight! *raarrrwrrr, hiss, scratch*
(
HappyToast Groat froth,
Mon 29 Sep 2008, 13:09,
archived)
*grabs folding chair and popcorn*
pleaser, continue.
(
Smash Monkey lowering the tone of the whole internet,
Mon 29 Sep 2008, 13:11,
archived)
see
wimmin like it when blokies start mauling eachother
much as blokies like it when wimmin start mauling each other
I don't know where I'm going with this thought :D
(
discomeats This canoe,
Mon 29 Sep 2008, 13:19,
archived)
for a mauling?
(
Smash Monkey lowering the tone of the whole internet,
Mon 29 Sep 2008, 13:23,
archived)
One of the most interesting side effects of the one child policy
is the elimination of uncles, aunts, cousins, brothers and sisters from the majority of families, thus eliminating the social emphasis on family ties.
(
gronkpan @vomitinglarry.bsky.social,
Mon 29 Sep 2008, 13:12,
archived)
Also:
I don't have a problem with how they run things. I'm glad I don't live there, but faced with the kind of overpopulation they have (thanks to mao), I think the one child policy was the most humane alternative. Invading Tibet? Also the lesser of two evils.
(
gronkpan @vomitinglarry.bsky.social,
Mon 29 Sep 2008, 13:21,
archived)
I mean, they didn't have to be such dicks about it
but we're all human. All however many billion of us.
(
gronkpan @vomitinglarry.bsky.social,
Mon 29 Sep 2008, 13:29,
archived)