yeah, and they're bitches about copyrighteven for paintings which are hundreds of years old, the national gallery still claims copyright on scans it makes of them. and for some reason uk law upholds this despite it not involving any original creativity (sweat of the brow copyright). the us law is much more sensible. *end rant*
(
the wub - guide onion for the blind,
Mon 29 Sep 2008, 14:04,
archived)